Receiving Bids Efficiently in the 21st Century
To support our industry’s evolution to more efficient procurement methods, BCCA has provided below the three methods of receiving bids and proposals (online, paper and email).
Ten years ago BCCA led construction procurement into the digital age with the introduction of online bidding and submission of proposals. We were ahead of the curve, and we were comfortable being there because we could see that technology would nearly eliminate non-compliant submissions. This has proven true, yet paper and email bids are still far too common.
Why are contractors not more proactive on insisting we change and owners sticking to old methods that are outdated and contain needless risk?
Today, in the midst of pandemic, when digital tools are literally keeping our economy – and our essential industry – going, there has never been a more urgent time to make the move to digital procurement.
Comparing Methods of Receiving Bids:
|
Online |
Paper |
|
Is recognized and encouraged by the BC Government and Canadian Government for construction bidding |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Bid recipient (owner or authorized rep) cannot manipulate closing time and information |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Provides an audit trail |
Yes |
No |
No |
Allows ease of evaluating compliant submissions and the results with the use of technology |
Yes |
No |
No |
Can reduce, or eliminate questions of transparency |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Controls timing of submissions to reduce potential for late and therefore non-compliant submissions |
Yes |
No |
No |
Complies with the requirements of CCA 90 Guidelines for Electronic Procurement |
Yes |
No |
No |
Reduce the impact on environment |
Yes |
No |
Yes |